
The outstanding value declines in photo voltaic photovoltaic (PV) and lithium-ion batteries over the previous a number of a long time have fueled optimism within the local weather coverage and funding neighborhood, with many hoping direct air seize (DAC) applied sciences would possibly comply with an identical trajectory. Policymakers, buyers, and trade proponents continuously draw analogies between DAC and these wildly profitable clean-energy applied sciences, invoking Wright’s Legislation—a rule of thumb the place prices fall predictably with cumulative doubling of manufacturing—to justify unjustifiably bullish projections for DAC’s future prices. Given the unrealistic eventualities requiring carbon removing to attain net-zero emissions, the attractiveness of DAC scaling cheaply and shortly is comprehensible, but such optimism calls for essential scrutiny grounded within the realities of expertise, markets, and physics.
I’m drawn again to this area, one I’ve been exploring for 15 years, doing technoeconomic assessments of World Thermostat’s applicability in heavy rail, Carbon Engineering’s pure market of enhanced oil restoration and chatting with lots of the main researchers and entrepreneurs within the area. Why am I drawn again? As a result of I wrote about Climework’s ongoing trainwreck—105 tons whole captured from a 40,000-ton annual homeopathy machine and now 22% layoffs—lately, and lots of commenters made it clear that they thought DAC would comply with photo voltaic and batteries into the nirvana of cheapness.
Photo voltaic PV and batteries achieved their value revolutions by means of clear, constant components. Foremost was Wright’s Legislation itself: with every doubling of worldwide cumulative manufacturing, photo voltaic PV noticed a couple of 20% discount in value, whereas lithium-ion batteries skilled roughly a 19% drop per doubling. Traditionally, Wright’s Legislation noticed 20% to 27% decreases, relying on the simplicity of the product. These spectacular and predictable studying charges emerged for photo voltaic and batteries as a result of each applied sciences shortly discovered mass-market functions with billions of end-users—photo voltaic panels throughout rooftops worldwide and lithium-ion cells powering shopper electronics and, later, electrical automobiles. Such monumental, various markets spurred large economies of scale, standardization of producing processes, and steady incremental innovation, driving down costs dramatically over comparatively brief durations.
In photo voltaic manufacturing, scale-up to gigawatt-scale factories allowed for unprecedented effectivity beneficial properties. Automation, production-line standardization, diminished materials utilization, and regular incremental enhancements in cell effectivity mixed to attain a 99% discount in prices because the Nineteen Seventies. Batteries adopted an identical sample. Initially costly lithium-ion cells quickly benefited from international shopper electronics markets, then exploded in scale with the electrical automobile growth of the 2010s. Improvements in chemistry, manufacturing strategies, and provide chain administration drove battery prices down by over 90% since 2010 alone. Crucially, each applied sciences turned genuinely commoditized, their prices falling sufficiently low to be enticing purely on market economics, unbiased of ongoing subsidies.

In stark distinction, DAC expertise faces elementary structural, thermodynamic, and market constraints that severely restrict its potential to emulate these learning-curve successes. Whereas DAC methods like these developed by Climeworks and Carbon Engineering additionally contain engineered modular items, their scale and replicability differ drastically from photo voltaic and batteries. Photo voltaic PV and battery items are small, similar, simply mass-produced elements numbering within the billions, permitting speedy parallel manufacturing and iterative optimization. DAC, conversely, entails massive, advanced industrial-scale modules that course of large volumes of air. Even extremely modularized DAC items like these envisioned by Climeworks signify important, capital-intensive methods, every processing lots of of hundreds to hundreds of thousands of cubic meters of air per ton of CO₂ captured. Attaining large-scale international deployment would contain hundreds of items—not billions—limiting alternatives for speedy studying by means of repetition and optimization.
Additional compounding this downside, DAC depends closely on mature, off-the-shelf applied sciences. Key elements similar to massive industrial followers, chemical sorbents, warmth exchangers, compressors, and pumps are already broadly used throughout industries. Not like rising semiconductor processes or battery chemistries that originally featured substantial inefficiencies ripe for innovation, DAC’s {hardware} elements are nearer to their optimized value flooring, having already benefited from a long time of engineering and scale in different functions. Incremental enhancements in sorbent chemistry or part effectivity could yield modest financial savings, however the potential for radical value reductions by means of basically new approaches or intensive technological simplifications is inherently restricted.
Maybe essentially the most cussed barrier DAC faces in following a PV-like value curve is rooted in fundamental physics: the energy-intensive nature of extracting CO₂ from the ambiance. Not like photo voltaic cells, whose main value drivers are fabrication effectivity and materials utilization, DAC confronts unavoidable thermodynamic constraints. The elemental minimal power required to seize CO₂ on the dilute concentrations present in ambient air units a tough, non-negotiable power ground. Present DAC operations use power at a number of instances the theoretical minimal, however even extremely optimistic eventualities nonetheless require substantial power enter, usually lots of to hundreds of kilowatt-hours per ton of CO₂. Thus, DAC will at all times incur important operational power prices that place a decrease certain on achievable pricing, not like photo voltaic panels and batteries, whose unit prices dropped quickly with higher manufacturing processes and supplies science advances.
Including complexity, DAC is bodily and materially intensive. Capturing hundreds of thousands of tons of CO₂ per 12 months calls for monumental quantities of infrastructure—metal, concrete, sorbent supplies, and complex capital tools. Not like digital expertise or small-scale shopper items, DAC items can not shrink considerably or dramatically cut back materials inputs with out sacrificing efficiency. Certainly, the massive bodily dimensions of air contactors, substantial volumes of sorbent materials wanted, and appreciable infrastructure for regeneration and compression counsel that DAC methods will stay heavy, advanced installations. As DAC scales, fairly than profit from repeatedly cheaper supplies, elevated demand for specialty chemical substances and industrial supplies could drive costs upward, doubtlessly offsetting some manufacturing effectivity beneficial properties. This state of affairs contrasts sharply with the declining per-unit materials depth that helped speed up photo voltaic and battery value reductions.
Critically, DAC lacks the autonomous, self-sustaining market demand that propelled photo voltaic PV and batteries. Solar energy and battery storage supplied direct financial advantages to hundreds of thousands of end-users, enabling them to grow to be cost-competitive with standard power sources over time. DAC, nevertheless, gives an environmental service—carbon removing—whose worth stays purely policy-dependent. With out strong carbon pricing, governmental incentives, or regulatory mandates, DAC has no inherent personal market demand, severely limiting its potential cumulative manufacturing development. Whereas photo voltaic panels and batteries quickly scaled by means of shopper and enterprise demand, DAC growth hinges completely on sustained public coverage help. Such policy-driven markets are susceptible to political shifts, funds constraints, and public sentiment, making exponential development in DAC manufacturing far much less predictable or assured.
Historic analogues from different large-scale industrial and environmental applied sciences underscore DAC’s difficult trajectory. Applied sciences similar to nuclear energy, large-scale carbon seize on fossil vegetation, and industrial chemical vegetation have all confronted related complexities and constraints, typically leading to sluggish, incremental value reductions—and even value escalation—as they scaled. These applied sciences supply extra instructive benchmarks for DAC than photo voltaic or batteries, highlighting the cautious actuality that DAC could expertise solely modest studying curves of round 10% per cumulative doubling, far slower than the 20% or extra seen in clean-energy shopper markets.

All of this results in 10% or much less value take out for lots fewer doublings for DAC fan items, the one part which can have any volumes. The chart ends at just under 10,000 items. For context, one million ton per 12 months Carbon Engineering system may need 250 contactor items, the essential module in a wall two kilometers lengthy and 20 meters excessive. They’d must construct 64 km of their system to get to eight,000 followers, and that’s exceedingly unlikely. To get one other 10%, they’d must construct 128 km of partitions of their system with 16,000 items. To get one other 10, 256 km with 32,000 items.
In the meantime, a single one GW photo voltaic farm has round 1.8 million photo voltaic panels. The volumes are radically completely different, and the speed of value decreases per doubling are radically completely different.
Wanting ahead, professional analyses from unbiased establishments just like the Worldwide Vitality Company, Harvard’s Belfer Heart, and the Nationwide Academies broadly agree: DAC prices will probably stay within the triple-digit greenback vary per ton even after a long time of scaling. Starry eyed eventualities predict DAC would possibly obtain prices round $150 to $250 per ton by mid-century below aggressive deployment assumptions. Extra practical projections settle increased, acknowledging inherent thermodynamic limits, persistent power prices, and materials constraints. Business-driven forecasts that envision DAC under $100 per ton are merely delusional, hinging on technological breakthroughs that may require altering the legal guidelines of physics and ludicrously low power value assumptions consequently.
Given these realities, policymakers and buyers should basically rethink their near-term engagement with DAC. Aggressively decreasing emissions by means of confirmed, lower-cost applied sciences similar to electrification, renewable power, and power effectivity ought to stay the clear and unambiguous precedence till power methods are totally decarbonized and surplus renewable electrical energy is considerable—probably not till after 2040 and doubtless past 2050. DAC, attributable to its inherently excessive power depth and substantial infrastructure necessities, mustn’t divert restricted assets from direct emission-reduction methods till we attain a degree the place clear power is cheap and plentiful.
Policymakers and buyers ought to restrict present DAC involvement strictly to analysis and growth, aiming to enhance expertise efficiency, cut back power necessities, and higher perceive practical long-term potential. Public spending on commercial-scale DAC deployment or infrastructure is untimely and dangers locking in inefficient, high-cost options earlier than cleaner, lower-cost alternate options are totally exploited.
Carbon removing methods within the quick a long time ought to as a substitute emphasize nature-based strategies and improved soil carbon sequestration—applied sciences with considerably decrease power calls for and clearer short-term scalability. The idea that we are able to vacuum sufficient CO2 out of the ambiance to succeed in 2050 targets needs to be deserted, and extra aggressive decarbonization eventualities pushed by means of.
Join CleanTechnica’s Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott’s in-depth analyses and excessive stage summaries, join our day by day e-newsletter, and/or comply with us on Google Information!
Whether or not you may have solar energy or not, please full our newest solar energy survey.
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Need to promote? Need to counsel a visitor for our CleanTech Discuss podcast? Contact us right here.
Join our day by day e-newsletter for 15 new cleantech tales a day. Or join our weekly one on prime tales of the week if day by day is simply too frequent.
CleanTechnica makes use of affiliate hyperlinks. See our coverage right here.
CleanTechnica’s Remark Coverage