The highest 25 weaknesses in software program in 2024

The highest 25 weaknesses in software program in 2024


MITRE lately launched its yearly checklist of the 2024 CWE High 25 Most Harmful Software program Weaknesses

This checklist differs from lists that include the most typical vulnerabilities, as it isn’t an inventory of vulnerabilities, however somewhat weaknesses in system design that may be exploited to leverage vulnerabilities. 

“By definition, code injection is an assault, and after we take into consideration the High 25 it’s figuring out the weaknesses beneath,” stated Alec Summers, venture chief for the CVE and CWE applications at MITRE. 

These weaknesses can probably pave the way in which for vulnerabilities and assaults, so it’s necessary to concentrate on them and mitigate them as a lot as potential.

In line with Summers, one pattern on this yr’s checklist is that whereas some weaknesses moved up or down the checklist, numerous the weaknesses on the checklist are traditional weaknesses which have been round for years, resembling people who allow SQL injection and cross-site scripting.

“The extra you perceive these weaknesses, and also you draw connections between these items, you may really begin to get rid of entire lessons of issues that we see so many instances,” he stated.

Addressing these weaknesses not solely improves product safety, but in addition has the potential to avoid wasting corporations cash as a result of “the extra weaknesses we keep away from in product improvement, the much less vulnerabilities to handle after deployment,” he defined.

This yr’s checklist contains the next weaknesses:

  1. Improper Neutralization of Enter Throughout Internet Web page Era (‘Cross-site Scripting’)
  2. Out-of-bounds Write
  3. Improper Neutralization of Particular Components utilized in an SQL Command (‘SQL Injection’)
  4. Cross-Website Request Forgery (CSRF)
  5. Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Listing (‘Path Traversal’)
  6. Out-of-bounds Learn
  7. Improper Neutralization of Particular Components utilized in an OS Command (‘OS Command Injection’)
  8. Use After Free
  9. Lacking Authorization
  10. Unrestricted Add of File with Harmful Sort
  11. Improper Management of Era of Code (‘Code Injection’)
  12. Improper Enter Validation
  13. Improper Neutralization of Particular Components utilized in a Command (‘Command Injection’)
  14. Improper Authentication
  15. Improper Privilege Administration
  16. Deserialization of Untrusted Knowledge
  17. Publicity of Delicate Info to an Unauthorized Actor
  18. Incorrect Authorization
  19. Server-Aspect Request Forgery (SSRF)
  20. Improper Restriction of Operations inside the Bounds of a Reminiscence Buffer
  21. NULL Pointer Dereference
  22. Use of Exhausting-coded Credentials
  23. Integer Overflow or Wraparound
  24. Uncontrolled Useful resource Consumption
  25. Lacking Authentication for Essential Perform

The dataset the checklist relies on contains information for 31,779 Widespread Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) printed between June 1, 2023 and June 1, 2024. 

In line with Summers, this yr, the methodology through which the checklist was created was completely different than in previous years as a result of MITRE and CISA concerned the broader safety neighborhood to research the dataset, whereas in earlier years MITRE’s Widespread Weak point Enumeration (CWE) group labored alone. 

This may increasingly have resulted in lots of modifications from earlier years, and this yr’s checklist solely featured three weaknesses that retained the identical rating as final yr: #3 Improper Neutralization of Particular Components utilized in an SQL Command (‘SQL Injection’), #10 Unrestricted Add of File with Harmful Sort, and #19 Server-Aspect Request Forgery (SSRF).

The weaknesses that had the largest upward transfer from final yr’s checklist are #4 Cross-Website Request Forgery, which moved up 5 ranks; #11 Improper Management of Era of Code (‘Code Injection’), which moved up 12 ranks; #15 Improper Privilege Administration, which moved up seven ranks; and #18 Incorrect Authorization, which moved up six ranks. 

Weaknesses that moved down in rank considerably embrace #12 Improper Enter Validation, which moved down six ranks; #21 NULL Pointer Dereference, which moved down 9 ranks; #23 Integer Overflow or Wraparound, which moved down 9 ranks; and #25 Lacking Authentication for Essential Perform, which moved down 5 ranks. 

This yr additionally noticed two new entries to the checklist and two entries that left the High 25. New entries embrace #17 Publicity of Delicate Info to an Unauthorized Actor and #24 Uncontrolled Useful resource Consumption. Earlier entries now not within the High 25 are Concurrent Execution utilizing Shared Useful resource with Improper Synchronization (‘Race Situation’) and Incorrect Default Permissions.

In line with MITRE, one potential explanation for the modifications is that they didn’t obtain CWE mappings from the U.S. Nationwide Vulnerability Database analysts for the CVE information from the primary half of 2024. 

“It’s not clear whether or not these gaps have an effect on the relative rankings, for the reason that distribution of unmapped CVEs appears more likely to align roughly with the CWE distribution of the complete information set,” MITRE wrote

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *