I’ve been following ChatGPT ever for the reason that AI chatbot went viral in late 2022. I began utilizing it shortly after, and it wasn’t lengthy earlier than I grew to become a ChatGPT Plus subscriber. I’ve been overlaying it alongside the way in which, explaining its new options and telling you ways you may need to use them to hurry up private or work duties.
From the get-go, I instructed you that you would be able to’t belief the whole lot the AI says. At all times ask for proof and verify sources. It’s not simply ChatGPT that hallucinates, which implies making up data. Different AI fashions do it, too. What’s extra, current OpenAI analysis reveals that its most superior ChatGPT fashions are likely to hallucinate much more than earlier variations, underscoring the necessity to confirm the knowledge the AI offers you.
I’m repeating that as a result of I simply discovered the dumbest use of ChatGPT AI but, which solely reinforces my level: You must study precisely what genAI merchandise like ChatGPT can do for you after which confirm that what they let you know is factually right, earlier than truly enjoying with them.
So what’s the dumbest use of ChatGPT but? A lady from Greece reportedly used ChatGPT to carry out espresso grounds studying on footage of espresso cups. The AI instructed her that her husband was both going to have an affair with one other girl or that he was having one. The lady filed for divorce, satisfied that what ChatGPT had instructed her was true.
The couple was married for 12 years and had two youngsters, per GreekCityTimes, when she requested the AI to interpret the espresso grounds in pictures of her and her husband’s cups.
ChatGPT regarded on the picture of the espresso cup belonging to her husband and instructed her {that a} mysterious girl with the preliminary “E” was the topic of her husband’s fantasies. He was destined to have a relationship together with her. The AI additionally regarded on the spouse’s cup and supplied a fair darker interpretation. The husband was already engaged in an affair with a lady who needed to destroy their house.
“She’s usually into stylish issues,” the person instructed the Greek morning present To Proino. “In the future, she made us Greek espresso and thought it could be enjoyable to take footage of the cups and have ChatGPT ‘learn’ them.”
“I laughed it off as nonsense,” he added. “However she took it critically. She requested me to depart, instructed our youngsters we had been getting divorced, after which I bought a name from a lawyer. That’s once I realized this wasn’t only a part.”
He refused to comply with a mutual separation, so the girl served him divorce papers solely three days later.
Apparently, the girl is into the supernatural. Nicely earlier than utilizing the AI to learn espresso grounds, she visited an astrologer. Her husband stated it took her a 12 months to simply accept that none of what that individual instructed her was actual.
Assuming for a second that I imagine in espresso, palm, or card readings, I’d nonetheless warn anybody that the AI can’t objectively try this. It doesn’t have the abilities of supposedly gifted people who know how you can. That’s what espresso readers have additionally stated, the report notes. It’s not nearly wanting on the grounds within the espresso cup. You need to analyze the froth and the espresso saucer.
However I don’t imagine in any of that, not to mention AI like ChatGPT making an attempt to make heads or tails of something.
Once more, that is the silliest use of ChatGPT I’ve encountered, however we’re most likely solely beginning to see loopy stuff coming from actual customers. It additionally sounds just like the form of story ChatGPT would invent.
Both the girl needed a divorce, and didn’t have the grounds (pun supposed), or she must find out how ChatGPT can do, which includes verifying its claims. Hiring a non-public detective as an alternative of a divorce lawyer may assist on this case.
I’m form of curious how this story ends. I’m not saying the person didn’t cheat or plan to do it with that “E” girl. And the way wild would it not be if he truly did? I might undoubtedly watch the Netflix TV present primarily based on this loopy ChatGPT story.
The person’s lawyer stated that claims made by an AI chatbot haven’t any authorized standing in courtroom, and I’m not even certain that wanted to be stated, particularly on this case. Nonetheless, the lawyer stated the person is “harmless till confirmed in any other case.”
Think about the girl’s lawyer making an attempt to argue in courtroom that the AI checked out espresso grounds in two espresso cups and concluded the husband was about to start out an affair, or was concerned in a single. I might need to watch that stay.
