Countering frequent myths about electrical autos

Delusion: EVs have higher lifecycle emissions than fuel automobiles
Reality: Gasoline automobiles emit as much as 3 times extra air pollution than EVs

Globally, electrical autos have been proven repeatedly to have decrease lifecycle emissions than conventional gas-powered autos, even in areas with fossil-fuel-dependent electrical energy grids.
Particularly, research have proven that EVs emit as a lot as 71% much less carbon air pollution than fuel automobiles—that features air pollution from mining, manufacturing, and driving. What’s extra, as mining and manufacturing are electrified, life cycle emissions from EVs will drop even additional.
What’s extra, EVs are particularly clear when battery recycling is included (as much as 95% of the fabric from an EV battery might be recycled).

Delusion: EVs are dearer than fuel automobiles
Reality: EVs are simply cheaper over their lifetime, and typically cheaper upfront

At present’s EV drivers pay the equal of $0.40 per litre fuel to cost their automobiles—lower than what drivers paid for fuel throughout the fuel wars of the ’90s.
When contemplating the complete price of possession over the course of a decade, from a automotive’s buy value to gas and upkeep, a typical EV saves drivers roughly $30,000 or about $3,000 a yr.
Particularly, selecting an electrical hatchback or SUV as a substitute of a fuel model will prevent $28,500 over a 10-year possession interval. The identical is true for sedans and vehicles. Choosing a Tesla Mannequin 3 as a substitute of a Lexus ES will prevent $38,000, whereas electrical truck drivers will save an enormous $40,000 over 10 years by selecting an electrical F-150 as a substitute of a gas-powered one.

Delusion: EV batteries want changing earlier than the automobile’s finish of life
Reality: EV batteries have been proven to final for greater than 20 years of driving

All EVs offered right now embrace a battery guarantee of a minimum of eight years and 160,000 kilometres.
A latest research discovered that EV batteries degrade simply 1.8% per yr on common—that means EV batteries can usually final greater than 20 years.
One other evaluation indicated that, out of 20,000 automobiles studied, solely 2.5% have required a battery substitute, and most have occurred beneath guarantee.
Tesla has claimed that the vary on its Mannequin S and X autos decreased by simply 12% after 321,000 kilometers of driving (these fashions are older and subsequently provide insights based mostly on real-world information).

Delusion: EVs would not have sufficient vary
Reality: The typical Canadian drives 60 kilometers per day—far lower than the typical EV vary of 480 kilometres

The common vary of recent EVs is now nearly 480 kilometres—and rising. Most Canadians drive lower than 60 kilometres per day, whereas the typical EV driver does between 80% to 90% of charging at residence, normally simply plugging in in a single day for comfort. What’s extra, these driving necessities imply that Stage 1 charging utilizing an everyday energy outlet is doubtless ample for many EV-owning households.
As Canada’s fast-charging community grows, vary and charging will develop into much less of a priority for longer journeys. There are actually quick chargers at 20 out of 23 ONroute relaxation stops in Ontario, whereas PetroCanada has already put in chargers alongside the TransCanada freeway from Halifax to Victoria.
The Authorities of Canada has dedicated to deploy 84,500 chargers by 2029 and is on monitor to satisfy its 2026 goal.

Delusion: The electrical energy grid can’t deal with EVs
Reality: With planning, grid-related points are simply avoidable

Whereas the change to EVs would require provinces to plan for EV progress, different international locations all over the world (EVs account for some 80% of recent automobiles offered in Norway) haven’t skilled grid-related points on account of excessive EV adoption.
A Canadian authorities research on the anticipated electrical energy wants of EVs discovered that they might symbolize 3%, 16%, and 22% {of electrical} energy demand in 2030, 2040, and 2050, respectively. Because the research states, “This quantity is important, however for the reason that progress is unfold over 30 years, with most occurring throughout the 2030 to 2050 timeframe, Canadian utilities have 10 years to refine the load forecast and plan for grid enlargement.”

Delusion: EVs should not appropriate for chilly Canadian winters
Reality: EVs are extra dependable in chilly climate than fuel automobiles

EVs do lose some vary throughout excessive chilly. Some research have proven vary loss to be no extra than 30% and as little as 8% for some makes and fashions. Nevertheless, different research of maximum chilly have discovered it to be between 30% and 50%.
EVs have significantly extra vary than required for many each day journeys (see fable 5).
What’s extra, chilly climate may enhance fuel automotive gas consumption by as much as 28%, successfully decreasing vary and rising gas prices.
As well as, most fashionable EVs have battery heating choices that preheat the battery earlier than driving to scale back vary loss.
Not like a fuel automotive, EVs would not have issues beginning in chilly climate, and lots of EVs enable house owners to remotely preheat the passenger compartment earlier than driving.

Delusion: EVs have a higher hearth threat than fuel automobiles
Reality: Fires are extra frequent in fuel automobiles than EVs

A 2022 research from insurance coverage web site AutoInsuranceEZ tracked automotive fires within the U.S., discovering that electrical autos noticed simply 25 fires per 100,000 EVs offered in comparison with 1,530 fires for each 100,000 fuel automobiles. In different phrases, fires occurred in a single in each 4,000 EVs in comparison with one in each 65 fuel automobiles.

Share extra sources

Share our postcards: